1.4 Science and Clinical Practice
Learning Objectives
Define the clinical practice of psychology and distinguish it from the science of psychology.
Explain how science is relevant to clinical practice.
Define the concept of an empirically supported treatment and give some examples.
Again, psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. But it is also the application of scientific research to “benefit society and improve people’s lives” (American Psychological Association, 2018). By far the most common and widely known application is the clinical practice of psychologyThe diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders and related problems.—the diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders and related problems. Let us use the term clinical practice broadly to refer to the activities of clinical and counseling psychologists, school psychologists, marriage and family therapists, licensed clinical social workers, and others who work with people individually or in small groups to identify and address their psychological difficulties. It is important to consider the relationship between scientific research and clinical practice because many students are especially interested in clinical practice, perhaps even as a career.
The main point here is that psychological disorders are part of the natural world. This means that questions about their nature, causes, and consequences are empirically testable and therefore subject to scientific study. As with other questions about human behavior, we cannot rely on our intuition or common sense for detailed and accurate answers. Consider, for example, that dozens of popular books and thousands of websites claim that adult children of people who abuse alcohol have a distinct personality profile, including low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, and difficulties with intimacy. Although this sounds plausible, scientific research has demonstrated that adult children of people who abuse alcohol are no more likely to have these problems than anybody else (Lilienfeld et al., 2010).
Similarly, questions about whether a particular psychotherapy works are empirically testable questions that can be answered by scientific research. If a new psychotherapy is an effective treatment for depression, then systematic observation should reveal that people who are depressed who receive this psychotherapy improve more than a similar group of people who are depressed who do not receive this psychotherapy (or who receive some alternative treatment). An empirically supported treatmentA psychological treatment that has been shown to be effective in scientific research studies. is one that has been studied scientifically and shown to result in greater improvement than no treatment, a placebo, or some alternative treatment. The Society for Clinical Psychology website provides a detailed list of empirically supported treatments for psychological disorders. This list is quite extensive and continues to be updated as new research is conducted. Below is a small sample of treatments that are currently considered to have “strong” support.
Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain
Behavioral activation for depression
Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult ADHD
Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder
Exposure therapy for specific phobias
Family focused therapy for bipolar disorder
Stimulus control therapy for insomnia
At the same time, however, it is also true that many clinical practitioners do not value science as a source of knowledge about psychological disorders or their treatment. In fact, some are outright hostile to it—often claiming that the clinical practice of psychology is an “art” that cannot be evaluated according to scientific criteria (Dawes, 1994). Unfortunately, these attitudes can lead to the creation and spread of pseudoscientific and potentially harmful treatments. One such treatment is “past life regression therapy,” which is based on the assumption that people’s psychological disorders are caused by traumas they experienced in past lives. The treatment involves hypnotizing them and encouraging them to recall these traumas so they can cope with them more effectively in the present. Not surprisingly, there is absolutely no scientific evidence for any of these claims.
One of the great challenges of the field of clinical practice is continuing to promote the scientific approach—which has proved immensely fruitful—and discouraging the pseudoscientific and potentially harmful ones.
The Ongoing Battle for Evidence-Based Treatment
Clinical psychologist and researcher Marsha Linehan, the creator of dialectical behavior therapy, discusses the importance of empirically supported treatments and some sources of resistance to them.
Transcript9.39 to 12.843 | - I'm a big believer in evidence-based treatment. |
14.67 to 16.11 | In other words, I'm a believer |
16.11 to 20.28 | in having treatments that have been found |
20.28 to 23.343 | in scientific investigations to actually be effective. |
24.72 to 27.27 | There are enormous number of treatments out there |
27.27 to 29.7 | that don't have any evidence |
29.7 to 31.77 | and there are enormous number of problems |
31.77 to 33.47 | that we don't have treatments for. |
34.32 to 36.45 | The behavior therapist's point of view |
36.45 to 39.78 | is that treatments need to be validated. |
39.78 to 43.26 | You need to have data that they in fact work, okay? |
43.26 to 46.74 | And the American Psychological Association would say |
46.74 to 51.57 | that a treatment has to be replicated at least three times |
51.57 to 54.45 | before you can call it an evidence-based treatment. |
54.45 to 57.96 | It's very easy to get one study that shows something works, |
57.96 to 59.85 | but then never get it replicated. |
59.85 to 61.38 | In other words, other people try to show |
61.38 to 63.9 | that it works again, but it doesn't work in the next study. |
63.9 to 66.123 | And we have loads of therapies like that. |
67.65 to 69.72 | The problem with psychological interventions is |
69.72 to 72 | that historically they have been viewed |
72 to 73.743 | as more art than science. |
76.29 to 78.6 | Medicine at one point was also viewed |
78.6 to 80.49 | as more art than science, |
80.49 to 84.87 | and medicine went from art to science. |
84.87 to 88.41 | And now there's all sorts of federal controls |
88.41 to 89.88 | on what you can do. |
89.88 to 92.4 | And that medications cannot be sold |
92.4 to 94.89 | if they haven't been determined already |
94.89 to 98.883 | to be evidence-based and not harmful. |
99.81 to 104.46 | The problem in psychological interventions |
104.46 to 107.52 | is that although we now have a lot of treatments |
107.52 to 109.5 | that are evidence-based, |
109.5 to 111.75 | there's no requirement that I know of |
111.75 to 115.35 | hardly anywhere except a couple of states |
115.35 to 117.9 | that people be provided evidence-based. |
117.9 to 121.59 | In other words, the FDA doesn't let drugs go out |
121.59 to 122.85 | that aren't evidence-based, |
122.85 to 126.42 | but there's no one saying, "This psychotherapy can't go out |
126.42 to 128.17 | 'cause there's no evidence for it." |
129.48 to 132.9 | And that being said, evidence-based treatments |
132.9 to 137.9 | are often not being taught in graduate schools. |
139.98 to 142.14 | Evidence-based psychological treatments |
142.14 to 145.68 | are ordinarily not taught in psychiatry programs. |
145.68 to 147.45 | There's a requirement in medical school |
147.45 to 151.47 | that you can't teach residents and medical students |
151.47 to 154.77 | to use medications and procedures that have no evidence. |
154.77 to 156.51 | Here's the problem. |
156.51 to 161.01 | Many people grew up and got trained before |
161.01 to 163.26 | there was a lot of evidence-based treatments. |
164.16 to 169.16 | The behavioral treatments were criticized for years |
169.23 to 172.17 | as only treating what was called symptoms. |
172.17 to 173.94 | I don't think anybody would say that now, |
173.94 to 176.703 | the data's too overwhelming for anyone to say it now. |
177.57 to 178.89 | But the facts of the matter are, |
178.89 to 182.37 | you have thousands of people trained |
182.37 to 184.86 | in non-evidence based treatments. |
184.86 to 188.28 | So it's in their interest to keep up the battle |
188.28 to 191.58 | that research is not that important, |
191.58 to 194.1 | because they could lose their jobs |
194.1 to 196.92 | or not be able to practice. |
196.92 to 198.45 | So there's a huge incentive, |
198.45 to 201.93 | but this is not unique to psychological interventions. |
201.93 to 203.88 | It happened in medicine too. |
203.88 to 206.79 | So it's just a battle that we haven't won yet |
206.79 to 209.55 | to where insurance companies |
209.55 to 211.683 | require evidence-based treatments. |
212.94 to 215.46 | The government requires them, states require, |
215.46 to 219.36 | we have some states that are requiring people |
219.36 to 221.37 | to provide evidence-based treatments. |
221.37 to 223.86 | Some places where they'll pay you more if you do it. |
223.86 to 225.813 | We just haven't won this battle yet. |
Key Takeaways
The clinical practice of psychology—the diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders—is one important application of the scientific discipline of psychology.
Scientific research is relevant to clinical practice because it provides detailed and accurate knowledge about psychological disorders and establishes whether treatments are effective.
Exercises
Discussion: Some clinicians argue that what they do is an “art form” based on intuition and personal experience and therefore cannot be evaluated scientifically. Write a paragraph about how satisfied you would be with such a clinician and why from each of three perspectives:
a potential client of the clinician
a judge who must decide whether to allow the clinician to testify as an expert witness in a child abuse case
an insurance company representative who must decide whether to reimburse the clinician for their services
Practice: Create a short list of questions that a client could ask a clinician to determine whether they pay sufficient attention to scientific research.
Practice: Choose one of the psychological disorders below (or choose one you are more interested in). Then do an internet search to find an empirically supported treatment for it, write a one-paragraph description of the treatment, and list at least one scientific study that supports it.
anorexia
generalized anxiety disorder
oppositional defiant disorder
trichotillomania (hair pulling)