You are viewing a complimentary preview of this book. For options to unlock the full book, please login or visit our catalog to create a FlatWorld Account and see purchase options.
Research Methods
Core Concepts and Skills for Psychology

v3.0 Paul C. Price

1.4 Science and Clinical Practice

Learning Objectives

  1. Define the clinical practice of psychology and distinguish it from the science of psychology.

  2. Explain how science is relevant to clinical practice.

  3. Define the concept of an empirically supported treatment and give some examples.

Again, psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. But it is also the application of scientific research to “benefit society and improve people’s lives” (American Psychological Association, 2018). By far the most common and widely known application is the —the diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders and related problems. Let us use the term clinical practice broadly to refer to the activities of clinical and counseling psychologists, school psychologists, marriage and family therapists, licensed clinical social workers, and others who work with people individually or in small groups to identify and address their psychological difficulties. It is important to consider the relationship between scientific research and clinical practice because many students are especially interested in clinical practice, perhaps even as a career.

Figure 1.6

The effectiveness of various forms of psychotherapy—for example, cognitive behavioral therapy for depression—can be determined by scientific research.

A woman leaning forward, clenching her hands, looking distressed with a therapist sitting in the background taking notes. 

The main point here is that psychological disorders are part of the natural world. This means that questions about their nature, causes, and consequences are empirically testable and therefore subject to scientific study. As with other questions about human behavior, we cannot rely on our intuition or common sense for detailed and accurate answers. Consider, for example, that dozens of popular books and thousands of websites claim that adult children of people who abuse alcohol have a distinct personality profile, including low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, and difficulties with intimacy. Although this sounds plausible, scientific research has demonstrated that adult children of people who abuse alcohol are no more likely to have these problems than anybody else (Lilienfeld et al., 2010).

Similarly, questions about whether a particular psychotherapy works are empirically testable questions that can be answered by scientific research. If a new psychotherapy is an effective treatment for depression, then systematic observation should reveal that people who are depressed who receive this psychotherapy improve more than a similar group of people who are depressed who do not receive this psychotherapy (or who receive some alternative treatment). An  is one that has been studied scientifically and shown to result in greater improvement than no treatment, a placebo, or some alternative treatment. The Society for Clinical Psychology website provides a detailed list of empirically supported treatments for psychological disorders. This list is quite extensive and continues to be updated as new research is conducted. Below is a small sample of treatments that are currently considered to have “strong” support.

  1. Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain

  2. Behavioral activation for depression

  3. Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult ADHD

  4. Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder

  5. Exposure therapy for specific phobias

  6. Family focused therapy for bipolar disorder

  7. Stimulus control therapy for insomnia

At the same time, however, it is also true that many clinical practitioners do not value science as a source of knowledge about psychological disorders or their treatment. In fact, some are outright hostile to it—often claiming that the clinical practice of psychology is an “art” that cannot be evaluated according to scientific criteria (Dawes, 1994). Unfortunately, these attitudes can lead to the creation and spread of pseudoscientific and potentially harmful treatments. One such treatment is “past life regression therapy,” which is based on the assumption that people’s psychological disorders are caused by traumas they experienced in past lives. The treatment involves hypnotizing them and encouraging them to recall these traumas so they can cope with them more effectively in the present. Not surprisingly, there is absolutely no scientific evidence for any of these claims.

One of the great challenges of the field of clinical practice is continuing to promote the scientific approach—which has proved immensely fruitful—and discouraging the pseudoscientific and potentially harmful ones. 

The Ongoing Battle for Evidence-Based Treatment

Clinical psychologist and researcher Marsha Linehan, the creator of dialectical behavior therapy, discusses the importance of empirically supported treatments and some sources of resistance to them.

9.39 to 12.843- I'm a big believer in
evidence-based treatment.
14.67 to 16.11In other words, I'm a believer
16.11 to 20.28in having treatments that have been found
20.28 to 23.343in scientific investigations
to actually be effective.
24.72 to 27.27There are enormous number
of treatments out there
27.27 to 29.7that don't have any evidence
29.7 to 31.77and there are enormous number of problems
31.77 to 33.47that we don't have treatments for.
34.32 to 36.45The behavior therapist's point of view
36.45 to 39.78is that treatments need to be validated.
39.78 to 43.26You need to have data that
they in fact work, okay?
43.26 to 46.74And the American Psychological
Association would say
46.74 to 51.57that a treatment has to be
replicated at least three times
51.57 to 54.45before you can call it an
evidence-based treatment.
54.45 to 57.96It's very easy to get one study
that shows something works,
57.96 to 59.85but then never get it replicated.
59.85 to 61.38In other words, other people try to show
61.38 to 63.9that it works again, but it
doesn't work in the next study.
63.9 to 66.123And we have loads of therapies like that.
67.65 to 69.72The problem with
psychological interventions is
69.72 to 72that historically they have been viewed
72 to 73.743as more art than science.
76.29 to 78.6Medicine at one point was also viewed
78.6 to 80.49as more art than science,
80.49 to 84.87and medicine went from art to science.
84.87 to 88.41And now there's all
sorts of federal controls
88.41 to 89.88on what you can do.
89.88 to 92.4And that medications cannot be sold
92.4 to 94.89if they haven't been determined already
94.89 to 98.883to be evidence-based and not harmful.
99.81 to 104.46The problem in psychological interventions
104.46 to 107.52is that although we now
have a lot of treatments
107.52 to 109.5that are evidence-based,
109.5 to 111.75there's no requirement that I know of
111.75 to 115.35hardly anywhere except a couple of states
115.35 to 117.9that people be provided evidence-based.
117.9 to 121.59In other words, the FDA
doesn't let drugs go out
121.59 to 122.85that aren't evidence-based,
122.85 to 126.42but there's no one saying,
"This psychotherapy can't go out
126.42 to 128.17'cause there's no evidence for it."
129.48 to 132.9And that being said,
evidence-based treatments
132.9 to 137.9are often not being taught
in graduate schools.
139.98 to 142.14Evidence-based psychological treatments
142.14 to 145.68are ordinarily not taught
in psychiatry programs.
145.68 to 147.45There's a requirement in medical school
147.45 to 151.47that you can't teach
residents and medical students
151.47 to 154.77to use medications and
procedures that have no evidence.
154.77 to 156.51Here's the problem.
156.51 to 161.01Many people grew up and got trained before
161.01 to 163.26there was a lot of
evidence-based treatments.
164.16 to 169.16The behavioral treatments
were criticized for years
169.23 to 172.17as only treating what was called symptoms.
172.17 to 173.94I don't think anybody would say that now,
173.94 to 176.703the data's too overwhelming
for anyone to say it now.
177.57 to 178.89But the facts of the matter are,
178.89 to 182.37you have thousands of people trained
182.37 to 184.86in non-evidence based treatments.
184.86 to 188.28So it's in their interest
to keep up the battle
188.28 to 191.58that research is not that important,
191.58 to 194.1because they could lose their jobs
194.1 to 196.92or not be able to practice.
196.92 to 198.45So there's a huge incentive,
198.45 to 201.93but this is not unique to
psychological interventions.
201.93 to 203.88It happened in medicine too.
203.88 to 206.79So it's just a battle
that we haven't won yet
206.79 to 209.55to where insurance companies
209.55 to 211.683require evidence-based treatments.
212.94 to 215.46The government requires
them, states require,
215.46 to 219.36we have some states that
are requiring people
219.36 to 221.37to provide evidence-based treatments.
221.37 to 223.86Some places where they'll
pay you more if you do it.
223.86 to 225.813We just haven't won this battle yet.

Key Takeaways

  1. The clinical practice of psychology—the diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders—is one important application of the scientific discipline of psychology.

  2. Scientific research is relevant to clinical practice because it provides detailed and accurate knowledge about psychological disorders and establishes whether treatments are effective.

Exercises

  1. Discussion: Some clinicians argue that what they do is an “art form” based on intuition and personal experience and therefore cannot be evaluated scientifically. Write a paragraph about how satisfied you would be with such a clinician and why from each of three perspectives:

    1. a potential client of the clinician

    2. a judge who must decide whether to allow the clinician to testify as an expert witness in a child abuse case

    3. an insurance company representative who must decide whether to reimburse the clinician for their services

  2. Practice: Create a short list of questions that a client could ask a clinician to determine whether they pay sufficient attention to scientific research.

  3. Practice: Choose one of the psychological disorders below (or choose one you are more interested in). Then do an internet search to find an empirically supported treatment for it, write a one-paragraph description of the treatment, and list at least one scientific study that supports it.

    1. anorexia

    2. generalized anxiety disorder

    3. oppositional defiant disorder

    4. trichotillomania (hair pulling)