You are viewing a complimentary preview of this book. For options to unlock the full book, please login or visit our catalog to create a FlatWorld Account and see purchase options.
Introduction to Public Speaking
An Inductive Approach

v1.0 Mark Ward Sr.

1.2 Constructing Knowledge

Learning Objectives

  1.  Visualize how knowledge of public speaking is “constructed.”

  2. Understand how the inductive approach to public speaking works.

Do you like murder mysteries? True crime dramas? The fascination of these shows is in their . You start with the final product—let’s say, a murder—and then you reason backward. Okay, someone’s been murdered. Let’s check the crime scene and look for clues. Then let’s figure out how all the clues fit together, like pieces of a puzzle, to give us the final product—the murder. Fictional detectives, from Sherlock Holmes to Nancy Drew, were renowned for their powers of deduction. Why? Because they could look at a crime scene and then—from a footprint, a cigarette butt, a scratch mark on the door—deduce the whole crime.

In the same way, the traditional deductive approach to public speaking starts with the final product—a whole speech. Thus, “Here’s how you do the beginning part of the speech, and here’s the middle part, and here’s the ending part. Now, go and give us a whole speech.”

But here’s another metaphor: Constructing knowledge is like constructing a building. A deductive approach would say, “Look at the whole building and now ‘deduce’ all the parts that go into it.” But an inductive approach would say, “Let’s see first how the foundation is laid, then how the building frame is put up, then how the walls and the roof are put on, and then how the inside of the building is finished.”

In our case, the knowledge you’ll construct is how to compose and deliver a good speech. With a deductive approach, students construct knowledge by seeing the whole speech first, then reviewing all the parts that go into it—topic, thesis, main points, research, organizational pattern, introduction, transitions, conclusion, audience analysis, vocal delivery, audiovisual aids—and then producing whole speeches of their own.

Deductive Approach versus Inductive Approach

283.425 to 284.795Created using pto.

The is different. First, you’ll learn how to introduce your speech—then how to conclude it, then how to speak these two-minute segments using notes, and so on. In other words, if constructing knowledge is like constructing a building, then you’ll construct your knowledge of public speaking one building block at a time. You’ll start with small “chunks” of speaking, just two minutes in length, and build only gradually toward a full speech. Taking on small chunks will reduce your anxiety and let you experience success that will build your confidence.

The inductive approach has another benefit. Again, think of how a building is constructed. A scaffold is erected to support each section of the building when it’s under construction. Only when the section is solid and stable is the scaffold is removed and placed around the next section to be built. In the same way, as you construct your knowledge about each part of a speech, your instructor and peer group will act as to support you until you’re ready to stand on your own.

Learning to speak is like constructing a building. In the deductive approach you see the final product first, review the parts that go into it, and then reproduce the final product. In the inductive approach used in this book, you learn each part of a speech one at a time and build gradually toward the final product.

On the left, a digital mockup of an apartment building. On the right, a photo of apartment buildings under construction.

Key Takeaway

  1. Constructing knowledge is like constructing a building; each component is added one at a time.

Exercise

  1. Discuss examples of things you’ve learned inductively—that is, one component at a time—and how that process constructed the knowledge you gained.